Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-structured instruction-only skill with explicit gating, terminal states, and a quality checklist that make it highly actionable. Adding a worked output example and an explicit error-recovery loop would push workflow clarity and actionability to full marks.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Terse imperative steps with no concept-explanation padding and a clear assumption of Claude's competence, though the guardrails and quality check slightly restate workflow constraints and could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable instruction-only guidance with explicit terminal states ('STOP', 'NEEDS VERIFICATION'), named gates, labeled output fields, and proof-gap handling, but no fully worked output example for the common case. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (gates in step 2, readiness labeling in step 7) and a final quality-check checklist, though it lacks an explicit validate-fix-retry feedback loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single-purpose skill under ~50 lines with no need for external references, organized into clear sections (Purpose, Required inputs, Workflow, Output format, Guardrails, Quality check, Example invocation), meeting the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |