Split a clinical note into canonical sections (Chief Complaint, HPI, PMH, Medications, Allergies, Assessment & Plan, etc.) before running OpenMed NER or de-identification, so section context sharpens downstream precision. Use when the user has a free-text note or discharge summary and wants section-aware processing, header detection, mapping headers to LOINC document-section codes, or per-section NER/de-id. Covers heuristic header detection, normalization to canonical section labels, LOINC/SecTag framing, and why a finding in PMH is historical while the same finding in A&P is active. Hand-off: feed each sectioned chunk into openmed.analyze_text / openmed.deidentify. Pairs before extracting-clinical-entities.
70
85%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
A clinical note is not flat text — it is a sequence of named sections (Chief Complaint, HPI, Past Medical History, Medications, Allergies, Assessment & Plan). The same phrase means different things in different sections: "diabetes" in PMH is historical context, "diabetes" in Assessment & Plan is an active problem, and "penicillin" under Allergies is an adverse-reaction flag, not a current medication. Splitting the note into canonical sections before NER or de-identification gives every downstream OpenMed step the context it needs to be more precise — and lets you process sensitive sections under stricter policies.
extracting-clinical-entities) or de-identification.import re
import openmed
# Synthetic note.
note = """CHIEF COMPLAINT: chest pain.
HPI: 54M with 2 hours of substernal pressure.
PAST MEDICAL HISTORY: type 2 diabetes, prior MI 2019.
MEDICATIONS: metformin 500 mg BID.
ALLERGIES: penicillin (rash).
ASSESSMENT AND PLAN: acute coronary syndrome; start aspirin, admit."""
# Map common header variants -> canonical section + LOINC document-section code.
SECTION_MAP = {
"chief complaint": ("Chief Complaint", "10154-3"),
"hpi": ("History of Present Illness", "10164-2"),
"history of present illness": ("History of Present Illness", "10164-2"),
"past medical history": ("Past Medical History", "11348-0"),
"medications": ("Medications", "10160-0"),
"allergies": ("Allergies", "48765-2"),
"assessment and plan": ("Assessment and Plan", "51847-2"),
}
HEADER_RE = re.compile(r"^(?P<h>[A-Z][A-Za-z /&]+):", re.MULTILINE)
# Split note into (canonical_label, loinc, body) chunks at each header.
chunks, matches = [], list(HEADER_RE.finditer(note))
for i, m in enumerate(matches):
raw = m.group("h").strip().lower()
label, loinc = SECTION_MAP.get(raw, (m.group("h").strip(), None))
body_start = m.end()
body_end = matches[i + 1].start() if i + 1 < len(matches) else len(note)
chunks.append({"section": label, "loinc": loinc,
"text": note[body_start:body_end].strip()})
# Run NER per section — pass the section label downstream as context.
for c in chunks:
ents = openmed.analyze_text(c["text"], model_name="disease_detection_superclinical",
output_format="dict")
c["entities"] = entsEach chunk now carries its canonical section label and LOINC code, so downstream context resolution can treat PMH findings as historical and A&P findings as active.
10164-2, PMH → 11348-0, Medications → 10160-0, Allergies → 48765-2,
A&P → 51847-2). Unknown headers keep their literal text and a null code.(section, loinc, body) spans between consecutive
headers, preserving original character offsets if you need to map results back.analyze_text / deidentify on each chunk and
carry the section label forward. This is where precision is won: section-aware
negation (PMH = historical) and section-specific de-id policy
(Social History / Family History often warrant stricter redaction).extracting-clinical-entities: feed each section chunk into
openmed.analyze_text and attach the section label to every entity — section
context measurably sharpens entity precision and downstream status assignment.deidentifying-clinical-text: run openmed.deidentify per section so
high-risk sections (Social/Family History) can use a stricter policy profile
than the body.resolving-clinical-context: the section label is a strong prior — PMH
biases temporality toward historical, A&P toward recent/active. Pass it as part
of the modifier window.reconciling-problem-lists: section provenance (PMH vs. A&P) is a key
signal for active-vs-resolved reconciliation.80da98c
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.