segmenting-clinical-sections
Split a clinical note into canonical sections (Chief Complaint, HPI, PMH, Medications, Allergies, Assessment & Plan, etc.) before running OpenMed NER or de-identification, so section context sharpens downstream precision. Use when the user has a free-text note or discharge summary and wants section-aware processing, header detection, mapping headers to LOINC document-section codes, or per-section NER/de-id. Covers heuristic header detection, normalization to canonical section labels, LOINC/SecTag framing, and why a finding in PMH is historical while the same finding in A&P is active. Hand-off: feed each sectioned chunk into openmed.analyze_text / openmed.deidentify. Pairs before extracting-clinical-entities.
70
85%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Low
Low-risk findings.
1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.
W011: Third-party content exposure detected (indirect prompt injection risk).
What this means
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
Why it was flagged
The required workflow chunks and forwards the user-provided clinical note text (free-form) into `openmed.analyze_text` per detected section headers; since this text is authored by an outsider relative to the operating user (e.g., patient/clinician content), it constitutes outsider-authored free text entering the LLM context.
- Repository
- maziyarpanahi/openmed
- Commit
80da98c
- Audited
- Security analysis
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.