CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

position

Builds a positioning canvas (competitive alternatives, differentiated value, best-fit customer, category) plus a strategic narrative and sales-pitch storyboard, and grades existing positioning or messaging. Use for 'positioning', 'how do we describe our product', 'messaging', 'our pitch isn't landing', 'category', 'differentiation', 'one-liner', 'value prop', 'old game new game'. Draws on 43 Lenny's Podcast guests incl. April Dunford, Andy Raskin and Arielle Jackson.

Quality

94%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A high-quality, highly actionable body with a clear diagnostic-to-deliverable workflow, explicit tests and defaults for expert disagreements, and a concrete output template. The main gap is content duplication with the reference files rather than a strict overview-plus-references split.

Suggestions

Remove the 'Receipts' section from SKILL.md and point to references/quotes.md instead — the same quotes (with timestamps) already live there, so the body currently pays for them twice.

Slim the per-play step detail that duplicates references/frameworks.md (e.g., the full five-step canvas walkthrough) into a short summary plus a pointer, keeping only the routing table and one worked example per play inline.

Consider adding a one-line note under 'Go deeper' on when to open quotes.md (e.g., to cite a guest verbatim in the deliverable) so the reference's purpose is discoverable at decision time.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense and assumes competence — no concept padding, tables used effectively — but the 'Receipts' quotes duplicate content already in references/quotes.md, and play details overlap references/frameworks.md, so a meaningful amount could be trimmed or moved. Efficient with minor instances of removable content rather than over-explanation.

4 / 5

Actionability

Fully executable instruction-only guidance: exact diagnostic questions to ask, step-by-step play procedures with worked examples (LevelJump so-what ladder, Square Stand H1), a copy-paste-ready markdown deliverable template, and a 1/3/5 grading rubric with a specified output format.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Clear Step 1 (diagnose, capped at 4 questions) → Step 2 (routing table) → Step 3 (run the play) sequence with explicit validation checkpoints: a 'Done when' criterion, the Bar Test and swappable test, category readiness factors, prospect testing with lean-in logging, and abandon-if-not-adopted feedback loops.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Two real, one-level-deep references (references/frameworks.md, references/quotes.md — both verified present) are clearly signaled under 'Go deeper' with descriptions. However, the body is more than an overview: play detail overlaps frameworks.md and the receipts section duplicates quotes.md, so the split is not fully clean.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: concrete capability statements, an explicit and varied trigger list, and a clearly bounded niche. The only weakness is slight overlap risk between generic marketing terms and adjacent skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'Builds a positioning canvas (competitive alternatives, differentiated value, best-fit customer, category) plus a strategic narrative and sales-pitch storyboard, and grades existing positioning or messaging' — covering the skill's full functionality with specifics, not vague domain labels.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (builds a canvas, strategic narrative, storyboard; grades existing positioning) and 'when' via a concrete 'Use for...' clause listing trigger phrases, matching the anchor example's structure.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The trigger list combines formal terms ('positioning', 'category', 'differentiation', 'value prop') with natural user phrasings ('how do we describe our product', 'our pitch isn't landing', 'one-liner', 'old game new game'), giving comprehensive natural-keyword coverage for this domain.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The positioning/messaging niche is clear with distinct triggers, but broad terms like 'messaging', 'one-liner' and 'value prop' carry minor overlap risk with closely related marketing, launch and pricing skills (which the skill itself lists as neighbors).

4 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository

menkesu/awesome-pm-skills

Path

skills/position/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.