Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, mostly executable retrieval workflow with clear sequencing, fallback chains, and useful domain-quality heuristics. Main weaknesses are minor redundancy (Tool Reference restating Phase 2 calls) and validation that is more implicit than stepwise in the later phases.
Suggestions
Remove or condense the trailing Tool Reference section, since every tool it lists already appears with usage context in the Phase 2 code block.
Add an explicit within-workflow validation checkpoint in Phase 2 (e.g., confirm PDB ID resolved and quality scores returned before composing the Phase 3 report) to tighten the feedback loop.
Tighten placeholder variables in code examples (define `uniprot_id`/`name` near their first use or pair them with a concrete value) so examples are closer to copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and assumes Claude's competence—domain reasoning gives useful judgment thresholds (pLDDT/resolution cutoffs) rather than explaining basics—but the trailing Tool Reference section duplicates tool calls already shown in Phase 2 and could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, real-signature tool calls (e.g., tu.tools.alphafold_get_prediction(uniprot_id=...), PDBeValidation_get_quality_scores), fallback-chain and error-handling tables; mostly executable with minor gaps from placeholder variables. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear Phase 0→1→2→3 sequence with explicit gating criteria in Phase 0, an Identity Checklist checkpoint in Phase 1, and feedback loops via fallback chains and the error-handling table, though within-phase validation in Phase 2/3 is more implicit than stepwise. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections (Domain Reasoning, Workflow, Phases, Quality Assessment, Error Handling, Tool Reference) with no nested references and easy navigation; slightly above the simple-skill threshold so a couple of dense blocks (full Tool Reference, quality tables) could arguably be split out. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |