Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean, highly actionable, and sequences an 8-phase workflow with validation and fallbacks. The main weakness is progressive disclosure: three of the four referenced files are missing from the bundle.
Suggestions
Create the referenced DIAGNOSTIC_WORKFLOW.md, REPORT_TEMPLATE.md, and CHECKLIST.md (or remove the broken links) so the 'Reference Files' navigation resolves.
Move the per-phase detail (scoring tiers, frequency classes, ACMG codes) into DIAGNOSTIC_WORKFLOW.md to keep SKILL.md a true overview, reducing inline bulk.
Verify the scripts/clinical_patterns.py interface is documented inline with a one-line usage example so Claude can invoke it without reading the full 36 KB file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense, table-driven, and reference-rich with no padding about concepts Claude already knows; each line carries domain-specific signal (tool params, scoring tiers, frequency thresholds). | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready tool invocations with exact parameters — e.g. `Orphanet_search_diseases(operation="search_diseases", query=keyword)`, `FAVOR_annotate_variant("chr-pos-ref-alt")` — plus explicit scoring rules and ACMG criteria. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 8-phase sequence (Phase 0–7) with validation checkpoints (evidence grading T1–T4, ClinGen inclusion/exclusion rules) and feedback loops (the Fallback Chains table for error recovery). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The 'Reference Files' section signals one-level-deep references clearly, but DIAGNOSTIC_WORKFLOW.md, REPORT_TEMPLATE.md, and CHECKLIST.md do not exist in the bundle — navigation would break — and substantial phase detail is inlined rather than split into those files. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |