Content
47%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill has excellent workflow clarity with well-defined steps, validation checkpoints, and error recovery, making it strong for guiding complex multi-step extraction. However, it is severely verbose with extensive repetition (prototype screen handling is explained 4+ times) and includes substantial background content that should be in separate files. Actionability is moderate — the workflow is specific about file paths and structures but deliberately vague about actual MCP tool names.
Suggestions
Reduce repetition dramatically: the prototype screen 3-task workflow appears in Steps 5, 7, Common Mistakes, and Implementation Notes — consolidate to one authoritative section and reference it.
Move the entire 'Background' section (content types table, best practices, troubleshooting, usage examples) to a separate reference file like `references/background.md` to cut the main skill by ~40%.
Specify actual MCP tool names instead of 'the appropriate Miro MCP item-retrieval tool' — this vagueness undermines actionability for the core operations.
Remove the 'Common Mistakes to Avoid' section entirely — it restates constraints already embedded in the workflow steps and adds ~50 lines of redundant content.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Extremely verbose at ~400+ lines. Massive repetition: the prototype screen 3-task workflow is explained at least 4 times (in task creation, extraction, common mistakes, and implementation notes). The 'Common Mistakes to Avoid' section largely restates what was already said. The 'Background' section explains concepts Claude can infer (what a board URL is, what images are, how to use specs). Every token does not earn its place. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides a clear structured workflow with specific file paths, directory structures, and JSON schemas. However, it deliberately avoids naming specific MCP tool names ('the appropriate Miro MCP item-retrieval tool'), uses no executable code beyond a subagent prompt template and a curl command, and relies on vague references like 'Call the appropriate MCP tool.' This makes it partially actionable but not fully copy-paste ready. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The multi-step workflow is clearly sequenced (9 numbered steps) with explicit validation checkpoints in Step 9 (verification checklist with specific failure conditions and remediation). Includes feedback loops: 'If verification fails, DO NOT report success' with re-extraction instructions. Task tracking provides progress visibility. Error handling is covered for each failure mode. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References 'references/spec-storage.md' and 'Plugin README' at the end, but no bundle files are provided so these are dead links. The Background section contains ~150 lines of supplementary content (best practices, troubleshooting, usage examples) that should be in separate reference files rather than inline. The main workflow section is well-structured but the document as a whole is monolithic. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |