Adversarially challenges a proposed plan, code change, or bug diagnosis from a hostile pre-mortem perspective. Walks a fixed taxonomy of failure modes, blast radius, rollback, hidden coupling, and maintainability; every finding must cite a file, line, or named assumption; forces a steelman of at least one alternative. Surfaces concerns only — does not score (delegates to `/confidence`) and does not apply fixes. Use during planning before autonomous execution, before opening a high-stakes PR, or when a fix "feels off". One adversarial pass per run — naïve self-refine loops amplify bias. Modes: plan (default), code, analysis; add `deep` to run 3–5 independent persona lenses in parallel (sub-agents when available, personas found via `ideate`) and merge them — e.g. at the end of a feature. Triggers on "critical", "challenge this", "pre-mortem", "red-team this", "deep critical review", "review from every angle", "/critical".
69
87%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
Passed
No findings from the security scan
This skill hasn't been evaluated yet
39b3f44
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.