Content
70%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, clearly sequenced workflow skill with strong validation checkpoints, weakened only by some tangential verbosity and guidance that defers concrete verification specifics to the plan and sub-skills.
Suggestions
Trim or relocate the subagent 'Note' and the 'Remember' recap, which restate guidance already covered in the process sections.
Add one or two concrete verification specifics (e.g. example commands or what 'verification' entails) instead of fully deferring to the plan, to lift actionability.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean with terse steps, but the subagent 'Note' paragraph and the 'Remember' recap restate information and add tangential context that could be trimmed. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives a concrete checklist (mark in_progress, follow steps exactly, mark completed) but defers specifics to the plan ('Run verifications as specified') and to sub-skills, with no concrete verification details of its own. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1-3 are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints ('If concerns: Raise', stop conditions, 'When to Revisit Earlier Steps') and feedback loops for blockers, matching the clear-sequence-with-validation anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist; the body is self-contained and well-organized into clearly labeled sections, satisfying the rubric's simple-skill allowance for progressive disclosure without external references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |