Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable routing skill with a concrete output contract, prioritized routing, and a validation checklist. The main weakness is a dangling example reference that breaks progressive disclosure, plus the absence of an explicit error-recovery loop.
Suggestions
Create the referenced examples/multi-file-change.md (or remove the broken link) so the one-level reference resolves to real content.
Add 1-2 inline worked classification examples (e.g., a small edit vs. a global-config change) to lift actionability and workflow clarity.
Turn the "验证" checklist into an explicit feedback loop: state what to do when a check fails (e.g., re-classify / stop and request authorization).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence (e.g., per-mode "处理" lines, the output contract block), with only minor redundancy between "分类/处理" and the re-stated "路由顺序" priorities. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance is present: a precise output-contract template ("模式/依据/允许动作/禁止动作/下一步") and specific per-mode handling, but no inline worked examples and the referenced examples file is missing, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear prioritized sequence is given ("路由顺序" 1-4) with an explicit post-classification "验证" checklist and a hard-fuse checkpoint for large tasks, but the checklist lacks an explicit validate->fix->retry recovery loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized with a clearly signaled one-level reference ("相关示例见 examples/multi-file-change.md"), but that referenced file does not exist, leaving a broken navigation dead-end that undercuts discovery. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |