CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

clarke-dawe-esque

Write an original deadpan two-person political-satire interview sketch (a mock-interview bit, not a monologue, panel show, or sitcom scene) using terse questions, absolutely-confident literal-minded answers, repetition, bureaucratic logic, and escalating contradiction, in the tradition of John Clarke and Bryan Dawe's satirical news interviews. Use this when a user asks for a satirical interview, mock-interview sketch, deadpan two-hander, or "Clarke and Dawe style" bit built around a policy, institution, or current-events topic. Do NOT use this for stand-up monologue jokes, sketch comedy with more than two speaking roles, sitcom-style scenes with stage direction and physical comedy, or any request to reproduce an actual historical Clarke and Dawe transcript verbatim — this skill generates new satire, it does not retrieve or reconstruct existing scripts.

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, highly actionable craft guide: concrete workflow, contrasting bad/good examples, an explicit verification checklist, and appropriately offloaded reference files. Its one weakness is length — Mindset, Craft Notes, and the example sections carry padding and redundancy that could be tightened without losing guidance value.

Suggestions

Tighten the Mindset section to a one- or two-sentence statement of the flat-delivery/absurd-content mismatch rule; the multi-clause explanation restates what the Anti-Patterns section already enforces.

Trim wordy asides in Craft Notes (e.g. 'it's a small thing, but it nudges the voice toward institutional rather than conversational, without needing an accent or catchphrase to do it') to the bare rule; consider merging the two weakest Practical Examples into the Anti-Pattern contrast blocks where the technique is already shown.

Move the fifth Verification bullet's read-aloud guidance into the existing escalation-pacing reference, which already covers pacing diagnosis, keeping the checklist to mechanical checks.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient, skill-specific craft guidance, but padded in places: the Mindset paragraph explains the deadpan mechanism at essay length, Craft Notes carries wordy asides ('it's a small thing, but it nudges the voice toward institutional...'), and the five Practical Example exchanges overlap partially with the three anti-pattern example exchanges. Not 2 because nothing explains generic concepts Claude already knows, and not 4 because the trimmable material is more than minor.

3 / 5

Actionability

For an instruction-only skill this is fully actionable: an 8-step concrete workflow (pick target, draft premise, open neutral, escalate one step, expose via follow-up, close understated, re-read check), five complete example exchanges each tagged to a technique, bad/good contrast pairs for every anti-pattern, and symptom-specific troubleshooting fixes. Examples cover the common cases, the copy-paste equivalent for a writing skill.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Clear numbered sequence from premise selection through closing, with an explicit Verification checklist (two voices, flatness, unresolved ending, no lifted lines, read-aloud test) and Troubleshooting branches that act as feedback loops (symptom -> diagnosis -> specific fix -> reference pointer). Matches anchor 5's sequence-plus-checkpoints-plus-error-recovery pattern.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is a navigable overview and the two extended topics (escalation pacing, institutional registers) are correctly split into real one-level-deep reference files, signaled both inline in Troubleshooting and in a When-to-Use References table. Both referenced files exist and contain no nested references; anchor 5.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

95%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: it states the deliverable, the stylistic mechanics, explicit use triggers with natural user phrasings including the named tradition, and clear negative scope boundaries. The only soft spot is that it leans long, packing the format definition, mechanics, tradition, triggers, and exclusions into one sentence each.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the concrete deliverable ('Write an original deadpan two-person political-satire interview sketch') plus several specific mechanics ('terse questions, absolutely-confident literal-minded answers, repetition, bureaucratic logic, and escalating contradiction'). Not 5 because it describes one output type with its stylistic mechanisms rather than multiple distinct operations, and not 3 because far more than 1-2 concrete actions are specified.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' ('Write an original deadpan two-person political-satire interview sketch...') and 'when' ('Use this when a user asks for a satirical interview, mock-interview sketch, deadpan two-hander, or "Clarke and Dawe style" bit...') with concrete trigger phrases, and adds an explicit when-not-to-use clause. Matches anchor 5 exactly.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Comprehensive natural phrasings users would actually say: 'satirical interview', 'mock-interview sketch', 'deadpan two-hander', '"Clarke and Dawe style" bit', plus the named tradition ('John Clarke and Bryan Dawe's satirical news interviews') and topic anchors ('policy, institution, or current-events topic'). Anchor 5's synonym-level coverage is met; no common variation is missing.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche with distinct triggers and explicit negative carve-outs ('Do NOT use this for stand-up monologue jokes, sketch comedy with more than two speaking roles, sitcom-style scenes...') that prevent overlap with monologue/sitcom/panel skills. Minimal conflict risk; anchor 5.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository

pantheon-org/tekhne

Path

skills/comedy/clarke-dawe-esque/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.