Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Excellent structure, actionability, and progressive disclosure: the two-mode workflow is precise, validation gates are explicit, and bundle files are well-signaled and real. The one notable weakness is token efficiency — the unsafe-intermediate-state material is duplicated nearly verbatim across three sections.
Suggestions
Consolidate the safe-deploy-point guidance: state the principle once in Core Principles with a pointer to references/dependency-analysis.md, and remove the duplicated three-failure-mode listings from Mode A step 5 and the Anti-patterns entry.
Trim WHY lines that restate common knowledge (e.g., "early detection is always cheaper", "distributed status creates stale reads") to one short clause each.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The safe-deploy-point concept is explained three times — the Core Principles bullet defining the three failure patterns, Mode A step 5 restating the check, and the Anti-patterns entry re-listing all three failure modes with definitions — which is substantial repetition that could be consolidated into the existing dependency-analysis reference. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable for a planning skill: a precise wave-assignment rule ("Wave 1 = tasks with no dependencies; Wave N = tasks whose all dependencies are in waves 1..N-1"), a concrete output path, runnable verification-gate commands, a status-transition diagram, and a worked recognition example with expected output. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Both modes have numbered steps with explicit validation checkpoints — Mode A step 7 checks structural invariants, and Mode B requires the Verification checklist to pass before marking a wave DONE, with a Blocked recovery path and next-wave announcement. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a lean overview and all four details (format, dependency analysis, status protocol, template) are pushed to one-level-deep reference files that exist on disk, each clearly signaled inline and summarized with descriptions in the References section. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |