Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable instruction-only skill with concrete operational guidance and a clear phased workflow. Minor room to tighten prose and make validation checkpoints more visually explicit in the workflow list.
Suggestions
Tighten or split out the per-method 'best for' descriptions in the Choose-the-method section to reduce inline bulk.
Add inline bolded validation callouts (e.g. '**Validate**: pilot 1–2 sessions before the main batch') in the Workflow list to make checkpoints scannable.
Consider moving the detailed failure-patterns list into a reference file to keep SKILL.md as a tighter overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient, actionable prose with terse aphoristic framing rather than concept explanation, though a few sections (e.g. method-by-method 'best for' notes) could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides highly concrete, specific guidance throughout — numeric recruit ratios (7 to schedule 5), incentive ranges ($50–$150), participant counts (5–15), explicit interview techniques, and a copy-ready findings document template with file names. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 9-step Workflow sequence plus a 6-phase framework with validation checkpoints (pilot sessions, test insight against data, track impact), but the workflow list lacks inline bolded validation callouts. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections with one clearly-signaled one-level-deep reference (interview-guide-template.md, verified present), though the main body is fairly long and inlines some content that could be split out. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |