Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary instruction-only skill: a tight five-phase workflow with concrete commands, verbatim prompts, mapping tables, and a copy-paste output template, all validated with explicit checkpoints and regression guards. The body is lean and every section is actionable; only minor verification steps lack how-to detail.
Suggestions
Add a one-line example of what a 'should-trigger' vs 'near-miss' trigger test case looks like so the Phase 4 description verification is executable, not just named.
Give Phase 1's 산출물 품질 check a 2–3 item checklist (e.g., 형식 준수 / 경로 일치 / 기준 충족) to make dead-code detection mechanical.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient throughout: no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, every section instructs rather than describes, and rationales ("왜 길어졌는지(스킬에 분량 배분 기준 부재)를 찾아") teach judgment instead of padding. The compact 원칙 section and single small diagram each earn their tokens. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly concrete for an instruction skill: an exact command ("git log --oneline -- .claude/ CLAUDE.md"), verbatim user prompts, a feedback-type→target mapping table, and a copy-paste change-history table template with a filled example row. Not a 5 because a few steps stay directional — e.g., trigger verification is specified as "should-trigger + near-miss 각 3개 이상" without how to run it, and 산출물 품질 inspection has no checklist. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five clearly sequenced phases with explicit validation checkpoints in Phase 4 (structure check, trigger verification, CLAUDE.md consistency) plus error-recovery feedback loops: "변경은 한 번에 하나씩 적용하고, 각 변경 직후 Phase 4를 실행한다" and the 퇴행 방지 conflict check that pauses for user confirmation before reverting a past change. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed: all content is single-file, well-organized with clear section headers, an overview diagram, and an explicit handoff to the separate harness skill for out-of-scope work. Nothing inlined here belongs in a separate reference file, and navigation via headers is trivial. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |