Use only when the user explicitly invokes $roborev-design-review-branch
48
50%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Passed
No findings from the security scan
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./internal/skills/codex/roborev-design-review-branch/SKILL.mdRequest a design review for all commits on the current branch and present the results.
$roborev-design-review-branch [--base <branch>] [--panel <name>|none]Invocation must be explicit: literal personal $roborev-design-review-branch, plugin
$roborev:roborev-design-review-branch, or structured Codex skill selection.
Requests such as “review this branch's design” without one of these
explicit mechanisms must use native behavior and must not run roborev.
Do NOT invoke this skill when the user is presenting or pasting existing review results. Messages that contain review findings, verdicts, or summaries are outputs — not requests to start a new review.
This skill requires you to execute bash commands to validate inputs and run the review. The task is not complete until the review finishes and you present the results to the user.
These instructions are guidelines, not a rigid script. Use the conversation context. Skip steps that are already satisfied. Defer to project-level CLAUDE.md instructions when they conflict with these steps.
When the user invokes $roborev-design-review-branch [--base <branch>] [--panel <name>|none]:
If a base branch is provided, use the base-branch command snippet below; it stores and validates the ref before invoking roborev review.
If validation fails, inform the user the ref is invalid. Do not proceed.
Construct and execute the review command:
If no base branch is specified, run:
roborev review --branch --wait --type design [--panel <name>|none]If a base branch is specified, run:
read -r branch <<'ROBOREV_REF'
<branch>
ROBOREV_REF
git rev-parse --verify -- "$branch" || exit 1
roborev review --branch --wait --type design --base "$branch" [--panel <name>|none]--base is specified, include it (otherwise auto-detects the base branch)--panel <name> is specified, include it (fans out to the named config panel); --panel none forces a single-agent reviewThe --wait flag blocks until the review completes.
If the command output contains an error (e.g., daemon not running, repo not initialized, review errored), report it to the user. Suggest roborev status to check the daemon, roborev init if the repo is not initialized, or re-running the review.
Otherwise, present the review to the user:
If you pass --panel <name>, or a default_panel is configured for explicit
reviews, the review fans out to a panel of reviewers. In that case the
Enqueued job <id> is the synthesis (parent) job that aggregates them, and
its verdict and findings are the synthesized result across the whole panel.
Present that synthesized verdict/findings, and offer fix on that parent id —
never an individual reviewer. roborev show prints a one-line reviewers summary
(e.g. 3 reviewers: bug P, security F) for a synthesis job. --panel none
forces a single-agent review, and automatic post-commit hook reviews stay
single-agent regardless of default_panel.
If the review has findings (verdict is Fail), offer to address them:
$roborev-fix <job_id>"Extract the job ID from the review output to include in the suggestion. Look for it in the Enqueued job <id> for ... line or in the review header. For a panel review this id is the synthesis parent.
If the review passed, confirm the result and do not offer $roborev-fix.
Default branch design review:
User: $roborev-design-review-branch
Agent:
roborev review --branch --wait --type design$roborev-fix 1042"Design review against a specific base:
User: $roborev-design-review-branch --base develop
Agent:
git rev-parse --verify -- "develop"roborev review --branch --wait --type design --base develop$roborev-fix 1043"$roborev-review-branch --type design — equivalent, with additional --type flexibility$roborev-design-review — design review a single commit$roborev-fix — fix a review's findings in coded121b1a
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.