Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a strong, actionable runbook: concrete commands, a clearly sequenced workflow with validation and error handling, and tidy sectioning. The only minor weakness is a few lines of explanation Claude could infer.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and well-structured, but includes some explanation Claude could infer (e.g. 'The --wait flag blocks until the review completes' and the --base auto-detect note), so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands — 'roborev review --branch --wait --type design', the 'git rev-parse --verify' validation snippet, and 'roborev status'/'roborev init' remediation — with concrete examples. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-step sequence (validate → run → present → next steps) includes an explicit validation checkpoint ('If validation fails… Do not proceed') and error-recovery paths for daemon/init failures. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | This single-purpose skill is organized into clear, well-signaled sections (Usage, When NOT to invoke, Instructions, Examples, See also) with no need for external references, and none are present. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |