CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

train-pose

Train/evaluate WiFi pose models honestly — camera-supervised (MediaPipe + CSI) and camera-free (WiFlow), always checked against the mean-pose baseline before any PCK is quoted.

74

Quality

91%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

train-pose

Build a CSI→pose model without overstating it. The project has a retracted 92.9%/100% history — the discipline below exists so it never recurs.

The non-negotiable: mean-pose baseline first

A pose model that always predicts the dataset's mean pose already scores ~50% PCK. Quote PCK only as a delta over that baseline, on a held-out split with no subject or temporal leakage. Example honest result (ADR-181):

Held-out PCK@20 59.5% vs a 50% mean-pose baseline = +9.4 pp real signal — MEASURED.

Paths

  • camera-supervised (ADR-079) — MediaPipe Pose labels the camera frame; paired CSI trains the net. Train/infer in one camera frame so the skeleton aligns.
  • camera-free (WiFlow, ADR-152) — no camera at inference; geometry-conditioned.
  • in-browser (ADR-181) — WebGPU/WASM trainer; the active backend is shown as a badge (honest about what's executing).

Before you publish a number

  1. Run the mean-pose baseline on the same split.
  2. Report (model − baseline) in pp, with the split definition (chronological / blocked-gap / grouped-bucket; no leakage).
  3. ruview_claim_check the writeup — it flags any untagged or 100%/perfect claim.
  4. If it's a benchmark vs SOTA, tag MEASURED-EQUIVALENT only with the reproducer.
Repository
ruvnet/RuView
Last updated
First committed

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.