Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean and well-structured with a clear validation-gated workflow, but actionability is held back by the absence of executable commands or invocation details for the referenced tool and ADRs.
Suggestions
Add a concrete invocation example for `ruview_claim_check` (command syntax and expected output) so the validation step is executable.
Make the publish workflow's feedback loop explicit, e.g., 'fix any flagged claim and re-run ruview_claim_check; only quote PCK when it passes'.
Show one concrete command for running the mean-pose baseline on a split so step 1 is copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no padding or explanation of basic concepts; every line earns its place and it assumes Claude's competence. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete checklist steps (run baseline, report 'model − baseline' in pp, ruview_claim_check the writeup) but no copy-paste executable commands or invocation syntax for the referenced tool/ADRs, leaving guidance incomplete. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear numbered 4-step 'Before you publish' sequence with an explicit validation checkpoint (ruview_claim_check flags claims), but the error-recovery loop is implicit rather than a gated 'only proceed when' step. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no external bundle files needed; well-organized sections (non-negotiable baseline, Paths, Before you publish) make navigation easy, satisfying the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |