Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an executable, well-sequenced orchestration recipe with concrete subagent invocations and explicit validation/approval checkpoints. Its only weakness is minor over-inline content and a single external reference rather than a clear in-bundle progressive-disclosure structure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and task-focused with minimal padding and assumes Claude's knowledge of subagent orchestration; only minor restatements could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete subagent_type values, exact field mappings, a verbatim document-reviewer prompt, and mechanical extraction instructions make the guidance copy-paste ready. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence is paired with an explicit Review Resolution Gate, a stop-and-obtain-approval checkpoint, and a feedback loop that re-invokes work-planner on requested changes. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well organized into sections and the only reference points to an external skill's review-resolution.md; some orchestrator-definition material is inline rather than split out, leaving minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |