CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

review-fix-loop

This skill should be used when the user asks to "address review feedback", "fix PR comments", "close findings", "respond to reviewer notes", or "reduce review churn". Enforces a finding-to-evidence closure loop for every review round.

76

Quality

93%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Review Fix Loop

Goal

Close review rounds with minimal back-and-forth by mapping every finding to a code change and proof.

Execution Loop

  1. Parse findings into P1, P2, P3.
  2. Build a closure table before editing.
  3. Implement the smallest coherent fix batch.
  4. Run targeted verification.
  5. Update closure table with outcomes.
  6. Run broader gate checks.

Closure Table

Use one row per finding:

FindingSeverityOwned filesPlanned changeVerification commandResult

Re-Run Control

  • If the same command fails twice, stop rerunning.
  • Isolate a smaller reproduction command.
  • Patch the smallest likely cause.
  • Re-run narrow verification before broad checks.

Verification Ladder

  • Start narrow: unit/module behavior checks for touched paths.
  • Continue medium: compile/lint/type checks for touched surfaces.
  • End broad: repository gate commands.

Handoff Requirements

  • Findings closed
  • Commands executed
  • Pass/fail evidence per finding
  • Remaining open findings with rationale
  • Residual risk
Repository
spacedriveapp/spacebot
Last updated
First committed

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.