Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured process skill with clear sequencing, explicit validation checkpoints, and a feedback loop. The only gap is the absence of concrete executable command examples in the verification ladder.
Suggestions
Add one concrete example verification command per ladder tier (narrow/medium/broad) so the verification section is copy-paste ready.
Show a populated closure-table row as an example so the empty header is immediately usable.
Specify what counts as 'pass' evidence per finding (e.g., command exit code or test name) to tighten the handoff requirements.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place (execution loop, closure table, verification ladder, handoff). | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, specific guidance (closure-table schema, verification-ladder tiers, re-run control rules) but offers no copy-paste executable commands or templates, leaving minor gaps versus fully executable instruction. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 6-step execution loop is clearly sequenced with explicit verification checkpoints (steps 4 and 6), a feedback loop (re-run control), and pass/fail evidence in handoff; validation is present, so the destructive/batch cap does not apply. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with well-organized sections and no need for external references (bundle dirs empty); per the simple-skill exception this warrants full marks for clear, navigable structure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |