Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is appropriately concise and well-structured as a thin pointer to an external protocol, but it provides little inline actionable detail and relies entirely on a cross-skill reference that may not reliably resolve from this skill's bundle.
Suggestions
Inline a minimal concrete checklist for the three phases (e.g., what '方案 + 影响分析' must contain, the exact 3 self-review questions) so the skill is actionable even if the external protocol is unavailable.
Move or copy the referenced protocol into this skill's own ./references/ directory and link it relatively, so the reference resolves within the skill bundle instead of depending on a sibling skill.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint in the workflow (e.g., 'before delivering [P7-COMPLETION], confirm the 3-question self-review passes') to make the feedback loop visible inline.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is ~3 lean lines that assume Claude's competence and delegate detail to the external protocol; no padded explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives a high-level 3-phase sequence ('先设计方案 + 影响分析,再实施编码,完成后三问自审查') and directs loading the protocol, but all concrete execution detail is delegated to an external file with no inline specifics, fitting 'some concrete guidance but incomplete'. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A sequence is present (design → implement → self-review) with the 3-question self-review as a checkpoint, but validation/feedback steps are not explicit inline and are deferred to the external protocol, matching 'steps listed but validation gaps; checkpoints implicit'. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a thin overview pointing to one clearly-signaled reference ('详细协议见 ../pua/references/p7-protocol.md') one level deep; good structure, though the reference resolves to a sibling skill's bundle rather than this skill's own, a minor organization gap keeping it below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |