Content
51%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a token-efficient stub that correctly intends to defer to protocol and core-skill references, but as shipped it is non-functional: every detailed artifact it points to is missing, leaving the skill with no self-contained actionable guidance or workflow. The structure is sound in intent but broken in practice.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced files (p9-protocol.md and agent-team.md) in a local references/ bundle, or inline the minimum protocol (the 六要素 Task Prompt structure and the 三条红线) so the skill is self-contained.
Add a concrete, sequenced workflow with at least one validation checkpoint (e.g., review Task Prompt against 六要素 before dispatching a P8) rather than a single "load and execute" instruction.
Convert the dead ../pua relative paths to bundle-local references or a clearly-resolvable skill invocation so navigation does not dead-end.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~10-line body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — each line (red-line tagline, two reference pointers, core-skill deferral) earns its place with no padding or concept re-explanation. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The body only delegates ("详细协议见…加载后按协议执行") with no concrete steps of its own, and the referenced files do not exist in the bundle, so the guidance is high-level hints rather than executable direction. | 2 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | No sequenced process is given; the only implied flow is "load protocol, then execute per protocol," which is poorly defined with no checkpoints, and the protocol it points to is absent. | 2 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | References are well-signaled and one level deep ("详见…", "见…"), but the referenced paths (../pua/references/p9-protocol.md, agent-team.md) and the /pua core skill are not present in the bundle, so the promised detail is unreachable. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 12 / 20 Passed |