Content
56%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable with concrete templates, escalation tables, and checklists, and its core workflows are clearly sequenced with validation gates. It is held back by significant redundancy across overlapping motivational sections and a monolithic structure that inlines reference-like catalog content rather than splitting it out.
Suggestions
Consolidate the redundant motivational sections (runtime contract, 三条铁律, 能动性鞭策话术, 抗合理化表) into a single source of truth — the same 'verify with evidence / don't give up / be proactive' themes are restated 4–5 times.
Move the ten 大厂 PUA 扩展包 flavor monologues and the 抗合理化表 into a references/flavor-packs.md file, keeping only the 情境 PUA 选择器 table and one example inline in SKILL.md.
Tighten each PUA quote to its distinctive core phrase; many monologues run 4–6 lines and overlap heavily with the 能动性鞭策话术 phrases.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Noticeably verbose with heavy redundancy — the runtime contract, 三条铁律, 能动性鞭策话术, 抗合理化表, and the ten 大厂 PUA 扩展包 all restate the same 'don't give up / verify with evidence / be proactive' themes; the ten flavor-pack monologues alone run ~80 lines and repeat each other. Not 1 because it does not pad with concepts Claude already knows. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, copy-paste-ready templates and protocols — '[PUA-DIAGNOSIS] 问题是 ___；证据是 ___；下一步动作是 ___', the L1–L4 escalation table with specific mandatory actions, the 7 项检查清单, and the [PUA-REPORT]/[PUA-CHECKPOINT] formats. Not 5 because residual abstraction remains ('本质不同的方案'). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 5-step methodology (闻味道→揪头发→照镜子→执行新方案→复盘) and L1–L4 escalation are clearly sequenced with checklists and validation/feedback loops. Not 5 because multiple overlapping workflow framings (runtime contract, iron rules, methodology, lifecycle framework) compete over which sequence applies when. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good section headers and one clearly-signaled one-level-deep reference ([运行契约](references/runtime-contract.md), verified to exist), but ~340 lines are largely inline — the ten flavor packs and 抗合理化表 read like a reference catalog that belongs in a separate file. Fits the 3 anchor 'content that should be separate is inline'. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |