Content
70%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and well-organized for a simple single-purpose skill, scoring high on token efficiency and structure, but lacks executable commands and an explicit validation feedback loop for the config mutation it performs.
Suggestions
Provide a concrete executable snippet for editing ~/.pua/config.json (e.g., a jq or Python one-liner) so the guidance is copy-paste ready.
Add an explicit validate->report loop: read the config back to confirm always_on=false and feedback_frequency=0 before emitting [PUA OFF].
Make the mkdir/preserve-unknown-fields handling a concrete step (e.g., 'jq --argjson ... ' preserving other keys) rather than a prose instruction.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is extremely lean (~4 short lines), assumes Claude's competence, explains no general concepts, and every token earns its place; this matches the score-3 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It names concrete fields (always_on=false, feedback_frequency=0) and a report action, but provides no executable command/code to edit JSON and 'preserve unknown fields' is guidance rather than a copy-paste-ready instruction. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are implied (set two fields, then report) with a validation-flavored checkpoint ('Do not claim completion without command/output evidence'), but there is no explicit validate->fix->retry loop for a config-mutation task, capping clarity at 2 per the feedback-loop guideline. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A simple under-50-line single-purpose skill with no external references and a clear one-level structure; per the simple-skills note this scores 3 with well-organized sections. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |