Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise, well-organized, and presents a clear workflow with an explicit verification gate, fitting a simple single-purpose skill. Its main weakness is actionability, since core protocol detail is deferred to an external 'p7 skill/protocol' that is neither bundled nor referenced by path.
Suggestions
Add a concrete pointer to the p7 skill/protocol (a file path or reference) or inline its three self-review questions so the body is self-contained and fully actionable.
Specify what 'self-review with three questions' means by listing the three questions, rather than leaving them undefined.
Optionally include a minimal example of the expected [P7-COMPLETION] deliverable format so the output is unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no concept padding; every line is operational ('plan, implement, self-review', config handling rules) and assumes Claude's competence, matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives concrete behavioral rules (preserve unknown fields, create ~/.pua/ if missing, require command/output evidence) but defers core detail to 'the p7 skill/protocol' without a path or bundled reference, leaving key details incomplete. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | For a simple skill it lays out a clear sequence (plan -> implement -> self-review -> deliver [P7-COMPLETION]) with an explicit validation checkpoint ('Do not claim completion without command/output evidence') and guards on config changes. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | It is a short, well-organized skill under 50 lines with no need for bundled references; per the simple-skills note, clean organization alone merits a 3 even without external file references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |