Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is admirably concise and well-structured for a simple delegating alias, but it references an external p7 protocol and an unspecified "three questions" self-review without detailing either. Adding the self-review questions and a pointer to the p7 protocol would close the gaps.
Suggestions
State the actual three self-review questions instead of referencing them, so the self-review step is executable.
Point to where the "p7 skill/protocol" lives (a path or bundled reference) so the delegation target is concrete.
Add an explicit validate/verify checkpoint for the `~/.pua/config.json` modification since it is a state-changing operation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, with every line carrying an instruction and no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives a concrete sequence ("plan, implement, self-review with three questions, and deliver [P7-COMPLETION]") but the "three questions" are referenced without being specified, leaving a key detail missing. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A rough sequence and a completion-evidence checkpoint exist, but the self-review step's validation content is undefined and there is no explicit validate-fix-retry loop for the config-file changes it performs. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The short, well-organized body needs no external file references, but it points to an unbundled "p7 skill/protocol" without signaling a path, leaving a minor navigation gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |