Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is admirably concise and well-scoped for a tiny alias/pointer skill, with sensible config-safety rules and a completion-evidence checkpoint. Its weakness is actionability: the central 'load and follow the pro skill/protocol' instruction is underspecified.
Suggestions
Specify how/where to load the pro skill/protocol (a path, command, or explicit 'invoke /pua:pro' step) so the core action is unambiguous.
Lightly sequence the steps (load protocol -> apply config changes safely -> verify with command/output evidence) to turn the rules into a clear workflow.
Clarify what 'command/output evidence' should look like before claiming completion, so the verification checkpoint is concrete.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every sentence carries an instruction, matching the level-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives concrete config rules ('preserve unknown fields', 'create ~/.pua/ if missing') but the core instruction 'Load and follow the pro skill/protocol' lacks where to load it from or how, leaving key details missing. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The content is a set of behavioral rules rather than a sequenced workflow; one verification rule exists ('Do not claim completion without command/output evidence') but the load step is unspecified and checkpoints are implicit. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a simple skill under 50 lines with no bundle files and no need for external references; per the rubric's simple-skills note, adequate organization alone qualifies for the top score. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |