Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is exceptionally lean and well-organized for a simple alias skill, earning top marks for conciseness and structure, but its core action — how to perform the Codex subcommand mapping and safely edit the config — lacks concrete commands and a validate/verify loop. Adding an explicit example of the mapping and a verification step before claiming completion would raise actionability and workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Add a concrete example of the /pua:pro → pua-pro command mapping (e.g. one or two actual commands) so the core action is executable, not just described.
Turn the config-editing guidance into a short numbered sequence with an explicit validation step (read → modify preserving unknown fields → verify → only then report), since config mutation is a destructive/batch operation.
Specify what 'command/output evidence' means concretely (e.g. show the executed command and its stdout) so the completion check is unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: three short sentences convey purpose, local-only privacy guarantee, and config-handling constraints with zero padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows — every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives some concrete guidance ('preserve unknown fields', 'create ~/.pua/ if missing', 'Do not claim completion without command/output evidence') but no concrete commands or examples showing how to map the subcommands or edit the config, leaving the core action underspecified. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A rough sequence is implied (map /pua:pro, edit config, report evidence) but there are no explicit checkpoints, and because config mutation is effectively a destructive/batch operation with only an outcome prohibition ('Do not claim completion without evidence') rather than a validate-then-fix loop, the destructive-operation cap holds at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This sub-50-line, single-purpose skill has no external references and is organized into a clear title plus three well-delimited paragraphs, which satisfies the simple-skill exception for a top progressive-disclosure score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |