Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is commendably lean with useful guardrails and a verification checkpoint, but it lacks the concrete details needed to fully execute the survey-and-save flow. Adding specifics on survey questions and response storage would make it fully actionable and sequenced.
Suggestions
Specify where and in what format the local response is saved (e.g., a path under ~/.pua/ and a JSON schema) to improve actionability.
Enumerate the survey flow as numbered steps (guide through questions -> save response -> ask before upload -> verify) with explicit checkpoints to raise workflow clarity.
Reference or inline the actual PUA survey questions so the guidance is executable rather than implied.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is four short lines with no concept padding, assuming Claude's competence. Not 2 because there is no unnecessary explanation to tighten; every line carries actionable instruction. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | 'preserve unknown fields and create ~/.pua/ if missing' and 'Ask before any upload' are concrete, but the survey content and where/how the local response is saved are unspecified. Not 3 because key executable details are missing; not 1 because several concrete guardrails are given. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A verification checkpoint exists ('Do not claim completion without command/output evidence'), but the guide-survey, save, upload steps are prose rather than an enumerated sequence with checkpoints. Not 3 because the sequence is not explicitly ordered; not 1 because a validation guardrail is present. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, needs no external references (none exist in references/scripts/assets), and is organized under a single clear heading. Per the simple-skills note, this scores 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |