Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is token-efficient and includes a genuine verification checkpoint, but the core action ('guide through the PUA survey') lacks the concrete detail needed to fully execute it.
Suggestions
Specify the PUA survey's questions or response schema (inline or via a referenced file) so the survey step is executable rather than implied.
Number the workflow steps (survey -> save response -> update config preserving unknown fields -> verify with command/output evidence) to make the sequence explicit.
Clarify whether the survey content lives in the referenced /pua:survey command so the reader knows where to obtain it.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, with every sentence carrying an actionable instruction or constraint and no padding or basic-concept explanation. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives a concrete save path and config-preservation rule, but 'Guide the user through the PUA survey' is high-level with the survey's actual content/questions undefined and no code or commands. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The implied sequence (survey -> save response -> conditionally update config) is supported by an explicit verification checkpoint ('Do not claim completion without command/output evidence'), with only minor sequencing gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This short single-purpose skill has no bundle files and stays compact under one heading; structure is appropriate for its size with only minor organization room. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |