Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-organized instruction set for a simple alias skill with a sensible validation/evidence guard. Its main weakness is actionability: it tells Claude what to do but not how to invoke the alias or parse its output.
Suggestions
Add the exact invocation command (e.g. "Run `$pua-team-status` to list agents") so the action is executable rather than implied.
Make the workflow explicit as a short ordered checklist (invoke alias -> parse state/PID/TTL -> flag stale records -> verify with output evidence).
Show an example of the expected output shape so "stale records" and "PID/TTL when available" are unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient: every line earns its place with no concept explanations or padding ("List current active PUA agent/team state, PID/TTL when available, and stale records"). It assumes Claude's competence throughout. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete guidance ("preserve unknown fields", "create ~/.pua/ if missing", "Do not claim completion without command/output evidence") but never specifies how to actually run the alias or obtain the listing, leaving key execution details missing. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | For a simple single-purpose skill the flow is clear and includes a validation checkpoint ("Do not claim completion without command/output evidence") plus a config-safety guard; not a 5 because the sequence is implicit rather than an explicit ordered checklist. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no external references needed; the content is a tight, well-organized overview with a heading and focused paragraphs, which per the rubric warrants a 5 for simple skills. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |