Content
52%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a richly actionable persona/behavior protocol with strong sequenced workflows and explicit validation, but it is verbose from heavy redundancy and its progressive disclosure is broken: it points to 5 reference files and 3 agent files that are not present in the bundle while inlining the very content those files should hold.
Suggestions
De-duplicate the four-layer architecture (it appears as the detection table, the ASCII diagram + roles table, and the 10-item 协作规则) into a single canonical section and cross-reference it elsewhere instead of restating.
Restore or bundle the referenced files (references/p7|p9|p10-protocol.md, references/platform.md, references/flavors.md, agents/*.md) so the signaled one-level-deep navigation actually resolves; otherwise inline only essentials and drop the dangling references.
Trim redundant proactive-behavior statements — 三条铁律, 能动性等级 table, 核心行为协议, and the 18-row 抗合理化表 all restate 'be proactive and verify'; consolidate to one authoritative section and keep the others as terse pointers.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~450-line body restates the same ideas repeatedly — the four-layer architecture is described three times (detection table, ASCII diagram + roles table, 10-item 协作规则) and proactive/verify behavior is repeated across 三条铁律, 能动性等级, 核心行为协议, and the 18-row 抗合理化表 — giving several padded/redundant sections that match anchor 2 rather than the tighter anchor 3. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | As an instruction skill it provides concrete, copy-paste-ready artifacts — the [PUA生效 🔥] good/bad marker examples, 5-step methodology, 7-item checklist, [PUA-REPORT]/[PUA-ESCALATION] formats, and the P8→P7 four-element task template — which is mostly executable guidance with only minor gaps where detail defers to absent references/*.md files. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 通用方法论 gives a clear 5-step sequence (闻味道→揪头发→照镜子→执行新方案→复盘) backed by an explicit 7-item checklist, pressure-escalation forced actions, and a strong explicit validation emphasis ('改了代码?build 一下 / 写了 API?curl 看返回值 / 没有验证的代码等于没写') with feedback loops, matching anchor 4; it stops short of 5 only because some sub-steps are metaphorical labels. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a monolithic ~450-line wall that inlines major blocks the skill's own design earmarks for separate files (13 flavor templates, platform command tables, four-layer protocols) while signaling references/ and agents/ paths — but the referenced files (references/*.md, agents/*.md) are absent from the bundle, so the signaled one-level-deep navigation leads nowhere, matching anchor 2. | 2 / 5 |
Total | 12 / 20 Passed |