Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is efficient and actionable with concrete ask_env examples and clear tool documentation, but workflows lack validation checkpoints and the large reference table is inlined rather than split into a bundled file.
Suggestions
Add explicit validation/checkpoint steps to the example workflows (e.g., confirm status=idle and arrival before issuing the next move).
Move the POI category table into a references/ file and link to it from the body to improve progressive disclosure.
Replace placeholders like <your_id> with concrete values in at least one end-to-end worked example.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and table-driven, assuming Claude's competence (no over-explanation of basic concepts); the long POI category table is reference data rather than padding, with only minor trim potential. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete ask_env call syntax and copy-paste-ready examples with real IDs and parameters; minor gaps remain from placeholders like <your_id> and natural-language instruction wording. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Examples imply a sequence (observe → recommend → move) but there are no explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops between steps. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized, but at ~130 lines with the bulk POI category table inlined and no separate reference files, content that could be split out remains inline. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |