Content
80%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, actionable, and well-structured, giving Claude exactly the invocations and domain data needed. Its main gaps are the absence of validation feedback loops and a lack of progressive disclosure via reference files.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation checkpoint after risky operations (e.g., after move_to, verify status via get_person that the agent is moving/idle as expected before proceeding) to lift workflow_clarity to 3.
Move the large POI-category table and detailed tool API reference into a references/ file linked from the body, keeping SKILL.md as a lean overview, to improve progressive_disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense and efficient — concept tables, tool signatures with parameters, and concise examples — with no padding or re-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; the large POI-category table is necessary domain taxonomy rather than fluff. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Gives the exact ask_env invocation format, per-tool parameter lists, and worked examples with concrete IDs ('Move person 0 to AOI 500000123 using driving') that are copy-paste ready for the agent. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Worked examples convey an observe→recommend→move sequence, but there are no explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops, fitting the anchor with 'steps present but checkpoints missing or implicit'. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized, but all reference detail (the full POI-category table and the tool/API reference) is inline with no bundle files or one-level-deep references to split it out, matching the anchor where content that should be separate is inline. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |