CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

employment-contract-templates

Create employment contracts, offer letters, and HR policy documents following legal best practices. Use when drafting employment agreements, creating HR policies, or standardizing employment documentation.

60

Quality

69%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/hr-legal-compliance/skills/employment-contract-templates/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

51%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured overview with excellent progressive disclosure, but it lacks a concrete drafting workflow and inline actionable templates, and carries some generic padding. The actual executable content lives entirely in the reference file.

Suggestions

Add a short numbered drafting workflow (e.g., 1. identify document type, 2. confirm jurisdiction, 3. pull template from references/details.md, 4. customize, 5. have legal counsel review before use) with legal review as an explicit validation checkpoint.

Trim the generic Do's/Don'ts platitudes (e.g., "Be clear and specific", "Don't discriminate") that Claude already knows, or replace them with employment-law-specific guidance that adds unique value.

Remove the "When to Use This Skill" list or fold it into the description, since it duplicates the frontmatter trigger phrases and adds token weight without new information.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The core concepts table and legal-considerations tree are tight, but the "When to Use" list duplicates the description's triggers and the Do's/Don'ts are generic platitudes ("Be clear and specific - Avoid ambiguity", "Don't discriminate") Claude already knows.

3 / 5

Actionability

A concrete document-type map (purpose/when-used) and legal-considerations tree are provided, but the body defers all executable templates and drafting steps to references/details.md rather than including any inline.

3 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Content is organized by topic rather than as a sequenced drafting workflow; legal-review validation appears only as a "Don't skip review" tip, not as an explicit checkpoint in a numbered sequence.

2 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A dedicated "Templates and detailed worked examples" section explicitly signals the one-level-deep references/details.md (verified: no nested file references), with templates appropriately split out and easy navigation.

5 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: it clearly states what the skill does and when to use it with concrete, natural trigger phrases and a distinct niche. The only gap is slightly limited action-verb variety and a few missing synonym variations.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Create employment contracts, offer letters, and HR policy documents" names three concrete document deliverables, but applies a single verb across them rather than multiple distinct actions, matching the 'several specific actions; minor gaps' anchor.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ("Create employment contracts, offer letters, and HR policy documents...") and when ("Use when drafting employment agreements, creating HR policies, or standardizing employment documentation.") with concrete trigger phrases, mirroring the anchor-5 example structure.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural user phrases appear ("drafting employment agreements", "creating HR policies", "offer letters", "employment contracts") with some synonym coverage, but common variations like "job offers", "employee handbook", or "onboarding" are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (employment/HR documentation) with distinct, domain-specific triggers and minimal overlap risk with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
wshobson/agents
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.