CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

deep-company-series

AI Berkshire skill: 看懂XX公司(深度公司系列):3-8 篇长文拆一家公司. Source: skills/deep-company-series.md.

60

Quality

71%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./codex-skills/deep-company-series/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, highly actionable workflow with explicit validation and feedback loops for destructive operations. Its only real limitation is monolithic single-file organization with minor conciseness trim opportunities.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense and directive (tables, checklists, 禁用词 with replacements) and assumes Claude's competence, with only minor restatement (篇数适配 re-explained, 一句话总结 reiterates) that could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Copy-paste-ready commands (grep privacy scan, git pull --rebase && commit && push), concrete file paths, a dated-suffix directory-conflict rule, and a 7-item checklist with an exact grep pattern give fully executable guidance across common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

执行流程 sequences 阶段1-4 with explicit validation checkpoints (7项检查, pre-publish grep, "确认无误才 push") and a feedback-loop revision流程 for destructive/batch operations, matching the top anchor.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist; the single ~260-line file is well-organized into numbered sections (一-八) with clear tables and headers, though it is monolithic with templates inlined rather than split into one-level-deep references.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description conveys a clear purpose and a reasonably distinct niche but lacks an explicit trigger clause and broader capability coverage. It is functional yet sits at the midpoint of the rubric.

Suggestions

Add a "Use when…" trigger clause naming concrete user phrasings (e.g., "Use when the user wants a multi-part deep-dive series on one company, not a single research report").

List 2-3 more specific capabilities (e.g., fact-checking, valuation, revision handling) to raise specificity beyond a single action.

Include natural synonyms/variations users might say (e.g., "公司深度分析", "拆解一家公司", "系列长文") to broaden trigger-term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"3-8 篇长文拆一家公司" and "看懂XX公司" name the domain plus 1-2 concrete actions, but the description does not enumerate the skill's broader capabilities (fact-checking, valuation, revision IP).

3 / 5

Completeness

The description gives a clear "what" (write a 3-8 article deep-dive series on one company) but no explicit "Use when…" trigger, so "when" is only weakly implied — capping completeness at 3 per the missing-trigger guideline.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural terms like "看懂公司", "深度公司系列", and "3-8 篇长文" are present, but common synonyms/variations are missing and "AI Berkshire skill:" / "Source:" are meta-labels rather than user triggers.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"3-8 篇长文拆一家公司" carves a distinct niche (multi-part deep series) versus single-report skills, with only minor overlap risk from the generic "AI Berkshire skill" prefix and sibling investment skills.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
xbtlin/ai-berkshire
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.