Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable five-step investing workflow with concrete metrics, validation checkpoints, and checklists. Its main weakness is a partly philosophical methodology section that adds token overhead without instructional value.
Suggestions
Trim the '方法论来源与本质' section to the three corrections and the sibling-skill boundary, removing the motivational '把财富建立在认知之上' framing.
Consider splitting the detailed inflection-point checklist and the five-dimension verification table into a reference file and linking to it from SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure.
Add an explicit validate-and-retry note for the high-frequency data cross-check step so contradictory signals trigger a re-verification loop rather than just being flagged.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly data-dense with tables and checklists, but the '方法论来源与本质' section and lines like '把财富建立在认知之上，而不是运气或情绪之上' are motivational padding Claude does not need; it could be tightened to a 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete analytical criteria are specified throughout — '营收增速、ROE 趋势、市占率变化', '周度/月度出货量、价格、订单、装机、渗透率', 'PE/PS 历史分位数 +3 标准差', 'PEG 视角', '毛利率连续两季下滑' — giving executable guidance with only minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence with explicit '产出' at each step, a five-dimension consistency check ('任何一个维度出现矛盾信号，必须明确写出'), a '结论三选一' branch, and an inflection-point checklist plus a '至少 3 条自我证伪' self-check; not a 5 because there is no explicit error-recovery feedback loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the skill is self-contained with well-organized section headers and no nested/broken references; it is monolithic rather than split into reference files, which keeps it at 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |