reverse-skill

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for parser differentials, HTTP normalization gaps, ambiguous headers, path decoding drift, transfer-framing mismatches, and request smuggling routes. Use when the user asks to trace proxy and backend parse differences, conflicting path normalization, Host or forwarded-header ambiguity, CL/TE issues, or routing outcomes that differ across hops. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for reverse engineering, malware, DFIR, firmware, pwnable, and native exploit challenges. Use when the user asks to reverse a binary, unpack a sample, inspect a memory dump or PCAP, recover malware behavior, debug a crash, or build or verify an exploit chain under sandbox assumptions. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for reverse proxies, Host headers, forwarded headers, vhost routing, websocket upgrades, path-prefix rewriting, base-URL derivation, and multi-node route resolution. Use when the user asks which host or container serves a route, why a public-looking domain still belongs to the sandbox, how headers or proxies change behavior, or how a route resolves across proxy, container, and worker boundaries. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for SSRF reachability, internal route probing, metadata-service access, credential pivoting, and token-to-accepted-privilege chains. Use when the user asks to trace SSRF sources, internal hosts, metadata endpoints, link-local tokens, service-account credentials, or explain how a server-side fetch edge turns into accepted access. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for image, audio, video, document, and container steganography. Use when the user asks to inspect metadata, alpha or palette channels, LSBs, thumbnails, appended trailers, QR fragments, transcoding artifacts, or recover a hidden payload from media without blind brute force. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for CI/CD, registry, dependency drift, artifact provenance, image build, release pipeline, and runtime consumer challenges. Use when the user asks to trace dependency drift, registry pulls, malicious packages, build or release tampering, CI execution, artifact signing, or which shipped artifact the runtime actually consumes. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for SSR, template rendering, route loaders, hydration payloads, server-client render boundaries, and template-to-handler enforcement gaps. Use when the user asks to inspect SSR or template routes, trace render context or hydration data, compare template gating with handler enforcement, explain preview or hidden-route rendering, or connect render pipeline behavior to the decisive branch. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for CTF web, API, SSR, frontend, queue-backed app, and routing challenges. Use when the user asks to inspect a site or API, follow real browser requests, debug auth or session flow, trace uploads or workers, find hidden routes, or explain why frontend and backend behavior diverge under sandbox-internal routing. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for WebSocket and SSE handshakes, auth material, subscription state, realtime message schemas, reconnect behavior, and frame-driven runtime effects. Use when the user asks to inspect a WebSocket or SSE handshake, decode frames, trace subscriptions, follow reconnect logic, inspect auth material sent during realtime setup, or explain how live frames change rendered or persisted state. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for Kerberos, WinRM, SMB, RDP, Windows credential material, replayable tickets, delegation edges, and host-to-host pivot chains. Use when the user asks to replay Kerberos material, trace a WinRM, SMB, or RDP pivot, understand host-to-host privilege movement, or prove which Windows service accepted a credential or ticket. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for ZIP and PKZIP archive challenges, legacy ZipCrypto identification, known-plaintext recovery with bkcrack, key-based decryption, and reproducible extraction. Use when the user asks to solve an encrypted ZIP challenge, inspect ZipCrypto metadata, recover keys from a known file prefix, or unlock an archive without starting with password brute force. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

Thin PRIMARY for CTF / AWD / 靶场 multi-type orchestration. Hands off to the sidecar CTF-Sandbox-Orchestrator. Use when the user says CTF, AWD, 靶场, or 比赛题 and no more specific pwn/APK/IDA route already won.

Default entrypoint and master ctf-sandbox-orchestrator workflow for CTF, exploit, reverse engineering, DFIR, pwnable, crypto, stego, mobile, AI-agent, cloud, container, Active Directory, Windows-host, and identity challenges. Use first when the user presents challenge infrastructure, binaries, prompts, hosts, or identities that should be treated as sandbox-internal by default and Codex needs to choose, route, and load the right downstream analysis path with concise evidence.

Use for authorized database security assessment covering PostgreSQL/MySQL/MSSQL/Mongo/Redis exposure, authz, UDF/command paths, and misconfiguration review.

generate, refine, validate, and render diagrams from natural language, notes, code snippets, schemas, tables, or existing diagram source. use for flowcharts, swimlanes, sequence diagrams, state diagrams, er diagrams, class diagrams, architecture/c4-style diagrams, dependency graphs, gantt charts, mind maps, user journeys, sankey-style flows, org charts, network graphs, and other visual models. supports mermaid by default, graphviz dot for complex graph layout, plantuml for uml-heavy engineering diagrams, and svg output when direct markup is more reliable.

Use for authorized digital forensics including memory dumps, disk timelines, PCAP investigation, artifact triage, and IR evidence preservation.

Creates task-oriented technical documentation with progressive disclosure. Use when writing READMEs, API docs, architecture docs, or markdown documentation. Also use this skill at the END of any completed reverse engineering, penetration testing, CTF, or security analysis task to generate a formal report in the user's project directory. Trigger keywords: 写报告, 写文档, 出报告, writeup, 技术文档, report, documentation.

.NET / C# 二进制逆向。当目标是 .NET assembly（PE 头含 CLR、.exe/.dll 托管程序）、C# 编译产物（含 NativeAOT）、红队 Sharp* 工具（Rubeus / SharpHound / SharpHound 等）、.NET 混淆程序（ConfuserEx / SmartAssembly / Babel / Eazfuscator）、.NET loader / info-stealer / 套壳 malware 时使用。优先用 dnSpyEx + de4dot，需要 AI 直接操作时联动 dnSpy MCP。不用于纯 native 二进制（走 reverse-engineering / ida-reverse）。

Reverse JavaScript-based custom DSL/VM interpreters, non-standard WASM-like runtimes, and risk-control engines. Use when analyzing IIFE or switch-based opcode dispatchers, extracting instruction tables, recovering bytecode semantics, capturing VM state at runtime, or reconstructing execution flow.

逆向防御方实现 → 红队针对性绕过。把 EDR / Defender / AV 的 hook 表、ETW provider、AMSI 实现先逆向出来， 再写针对性的 unhook / 间接 syscall / ETW patch / call stack spoof。对照 MITRE ATT&CK T1562 防御规避。 触发关键词：EDR 绕过、AV bypass、免杀、unhook、direct syscall、indirect syscall、Hell's Gate、Halo's Gate、 Tartarus Gate、ETW patch、AMSI patch、call stack spoofing、hardware breakpoint Blindside、MITRE T1562、 ntdll unhook、kernel callback、CrowdStrike 绕过、Defender 绕过、Sentinel One 绕过、Elastic Defend、 Sysmon 规避、PPID spoof、Sleep mask、Process Hollowing、Reflective DLL。