Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, actionable skill body with concrete commands and a complete worked example. The main gaps are a missing verification checkpoint in the workflow and an unlinked reference file that should be surfaced from the body.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification step after placement (e.g., `look at orange box` to confirm the object is inside) to give the workflow a validation checkpoint.
Link references/action_guide.md from the Key Actions section (e.g., 'See action_guide.md for the full action reference') so the bundle file is discoverable.
Collapse the Key Actions table or merge it into the workflow to remove the minor redundancy with the Core Workflow steps.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and assumes Claude's competence with no padding or concept explanations, though the Key Actions table partially duplicates the verb phrasing already embedded in the Core Workflow steps and could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides fully concrete, executable ScienceWorld commands (`teleport to LOC`, `pick up OBJ`, `use thermometer on metal fork`, `move metal fork to orange box`) plus a complete worked example with real values (72 degrees > 50), covering the common case end-to-end. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear, numbered 5-step measure-then-sort sequence reinforced by a worked example, but it lacks an explicit verification checkpoint after the measurement read and after the placement (e.g., confirming the object landed in the intended container). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections (Purpose, Core Workflow, Key Actions, Example, Notes) within a short body, but the existing bundle file references/action_guide.md is never linked or signaled from the body, leaving a minor navigation gap for the additional action detail it contains. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |