Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, highly actionable skill body with an excellent worked example and clear step sequencing. The main gaps are the orphaned references/action_guide.md, which is never linked from the body (leaving its additional actions undiscoverable and the Key Actions table duplicating part of it), and the absence of a small validation checkpoint on the measurement result.
Suggestions
Link references/action_guide.md from the body (e.g., under Key Actions: 'Full action reference: see references/action_guide.md'), so its additional actions like 'examine OBJ' and 'look at OBJ' are discoverable.
De-duplicate the Key Actions table against the Core Workflow steps, or replace it with a pointer to the action guide to save tokens.
Add a brief checkpoint before placement, e.g., 'If the measurement returns no value, verify both objects are in inventory and re-run use OBJ on OBJ'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence (no concept explanations), but the Key Actions table ('teleport to LOC', 'pick up OBJ', 'use OBJ on OBJ', 'move OBJ to OBJ') restates commands already given step-by-step in Core Workflow, which is a minor instance of duplication that could be trimmed. Not 5 due to this redundancy; well above the 'noticeably verbose' level. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable: exact environment commands in every step, and a complete worked example with real values ('use thermometer on metal fork — reads 72 degrees', '72 > 50, so: move metal fork to orange box'). This matches the anchor for copy-paste-ready commands with a specific example covering the common case. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five-step Core Workflow is clearly sequenced with concrete commands, and the Important Notes flag a real pitfall (containers are pre-opened; do not use open/close). It falls short of 5 because there is no checkpoint confirming the measurement returned a usable value before evaluating the condition, but the operation is neither destructive nor batch, so no cap applies. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well organized into Purpose / Core Workflow / Key Actions / Example / Important Notes, but the bundle contains references/action_guide.md which is never mentioned or linked anywhere in the body — its additional actions (e.g., 'examine OBJ', 'look at OBJ') are undiscoverable from SKILL.md, and the inline Key Actions table duplicates content that also lives in that reference. Per the guideline to score against the actual bundle structure, this fits 'references present but not clearly signaled; content that should be separate is inline' rather than the well-signaled level. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |