Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, actionable, and provides a clear verify-checked workflow with a strong worked example. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: the action_primer.md reference exists but is orphaned, with its content duplicated inline rather than linked.
Suggestions
Replace or augment the inline Key Actions table with a pointer to references/action_primer.md so the bundle reference is actually surfaced and avoids duplication.
Add a brief failure/retry note to the Verify step (e.g., if `look at OBJ` shows the transfer did not succeed, re-check identifiers and re-pour) to turn the checkpoint into a feedback loop.
Trim the identifier-precision point in 'Important Notes' since it restates guidance already implied by the workflow and example.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with purpose, workflow, an action table, and a worked example that earn their tokens; minor repetition in 'Important Notes' (re-stating precise identifier handling) keeps it just below anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete commands (`pour OBJ into OBJ`, `look around`, `look at OBJ`) and a copy-paste-ready example with exact identifiers (`wood cup (containing red paint)`) cover the common cases, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Core Workflow is a clear identify -> pour -> verify sequence with an explicit verification checkpoint, but it lacks an explicit failure/retry feedback loop, so it sits at anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized, but the bundled references/action_primer.md is never referenced from the body while its action list is duplicated inline in the Key Actions table, fitting anchor 3 (references present but not clearly signaled; content that should be separate is inline). | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |