Content
56%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers a genuinely rigorous, evidence-gated workflow with copy-paste templates and explicit disambiguation tables — actionability and workflow clarity are solid. But it is severely overloaded: anecdotal narrative, dated internal history, and multiple semi-independent sub-policies (taste signals, cat-initiated friction reporting) are inlined into a monolithic 337-line file with no reference files at all.
Suggestions
Strip narrative anecdotes, provenance notes, and dated references (2026-06-01, 2026-06-10, 2026-07-15, '48 review 钉死的') down to the operative rule; move dates to a changelog/old-patterns file if they must be kept.
Split the cat-initiated 雨刮器上报细则 and the F221 taste-signal path into separate reference files under references/, keeping SKILL.md as a decision-map plus the core Phase 1-5 flow.
Add one concrete worked example (signal → evidence search result → root-cause classification → chosen output block) so the end-to-end flow is executable rather than inferable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The 337-line body carries substantial padding a competent agent does not need: narrative anecdotes ("水管漏了拿盆接着继续做饭，绝不叫水管工"), provenance storytelling ("2026-06-10 一场闲聊钓出三单暗税摩擦后 operator signoff"), dated references ("2026-06-01~02 PoE brainstorm", "2026-07-15") not placed in a deprecated/old-patterns section, and a ~120-token verbatim quote of the staging clause alongside its expansion. This matches 'noticeably verbose; several unnecessary explanations or padded sections'; it is not a 3 because the volume of narrative/why-prose and internal history is pervasive rather than occasional. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | The body provides mostly executable guidance: copy-paste YAML templates for the interactive block and result card, an exact F128 initialMessage template, a concrete marker format ("[爪感差: 工具名+现象一句话]"), and specific tool calls (search_evidence, feat_index, cat_cafe_propose_taste, cat_cafe_propose_thread) with argument expectations. It is not a 5 because several steps remain directive rather than executable (e.g. `search_evidence("{纠偏关键词}")` is a placeholder, the Build-mode flow is a 5-line meta-method sketch, and no concrete worked example of an end-to-end diagnosis is shown). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The multi-step process is clearly sequenced with real validation checkpoints: an evidence gate before diagnosis ("先搜证据确认是否真的重复，不凭字面关键词判断"), a decision flow diagram, Phase 1-5 with a root-cause classification table, an explicit output-contract table keyed on confirmation/authorization state, and owner-thread verification before cross-posting ("模糊关键词命中或\"看起来最像\"不算"). It is not a 5 because some junctions are implicit — e.g. the cat-initiated 雨刮器 path and the operator-driven path interleave without a single entry map, and Phase 5's escalation rows repeat rather than reference the Phase 4 conditions. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories), and the entire skill is inlined in one ~20KB SKILL.md. Section headers and tables give real structure, but clearly separable material — the taste-signal path (F221), the F128 initialMessage template, the 雨刮器 reporting细则 — lives inline, matching 'some structure but content that should be separate is inline'. It is not a 4 because there are no well-signaled one-level-deep references at all, and the file length (337 lines) makes the monolith costly to load. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |