Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable body with concrete tools, copy-paste templates, and a well-sequenced phased workflow. It loses points on conciseness (heavy rule repetition) and progressive disclosure (no reference files despite sizable self-contained sub-topics).
Suggestions
Deduplicate the "先搜证据确认重复" and "一次性新任务直接做不建 harness" rules — state each once in 核心原则 and let tables/Phase steps reference rather than re-explain it.
Extract the 雨刮器条款细则 and the taste-signal path into reference files (e.g. references/friction-reporting.md, references/taste-signals.md) and link to them one level deep, keeping SKILL.md as an overview.
Consolidate the 不触发/灰区/Common Mistakes tables — several rows restate the same distinction (one-off vs repeated), which could be merged to save tokens.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is non-fluffy and assumes Claude's competence, but the same core rules are restated many times — "先搜证据确认重复" recurs in 核心原则, the 触发判定铁律, 判定流程, Phase 1, and two Common Mistakes rows; "一次性新任务直接做不建 harness" repeats across 核心原则, 灰区, Build前置闸门, and Common Mistakes — so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete tool calls (search_evidence, list_threads, cat_cafe_create_rich_block, cat_cafe_propose_thread), exact file paths (docs/taste/vignettes/, private/taste/), and copy-paste-ready YAML rich-block and F128 initialMessage templates — fully executable guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear Phase 1→5 sequence with an explicit pre-gate (搜证据 → YES/NO), a quantification step, a root-cause classification table, and a Common Mistakes table serving as error-recovery feedback, plus downstream routing to request-review/merge-gate. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized with headers, but at ~260 lines with no bundle files and zero external references, self-contained sub-flows (雨刮器条款细则, the taste-signal path, the F128 template) are inline when they would benefit from being split into one-level-deep reference files. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |