CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

memory-navigation

记忆系统三入口路由(search_evidence / graph_resolve / list_recent)决策树 + 噪音控制 + 加载时机。F188 Phase F (AC-F6) 配套 skill。 Use when: 没先验、压缩后回顾、"我记得最近讨论过 X"、search_evidence 反复 low-hit。 Not for: 已有消息坐标或文件路径时直接读原文;代码符号查 Grep/LSP。 Output: 选定入口 + 噪音控制参数 + 进入对应 MCP 工具。

Quality

89%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

An unusually actionable routing skill: the decision tree, noise-control parameter tables, and explicit feedback loops (low-hit nudge handling, relevance-vs-evidence discipline) give copy-paste-ready guidance with no concept padding. The only real gaps are minor — slight duplication between 'When to load' and the frontmatter, and a reference section with a removed-placeholder remnant and no in-bundle files.

Suggestions

Trim the 'When to load' section or differentiate it from the frontmatter description to remove near-duplicate trigger lists and save tokens.

Clean up the '相关' section: drop the '*(internal reference removed)*' placeholder line, and either inline the essential content of `../.cat-cafe-shared-refs/memory-routing-partial.md` into a `references/` bundle file or state what the partial adds so navigation to it is self-contained.

Replace the meta-commentary lines in 关键纪律 (e.g. '猫的认知成本来自…') with the operational rule alone, keeping the discipline items instruction-shaped.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Dense, operational guidance with no padding explaining concepts Claude already knows, but minor redundancy exists: the 'When to load' list largely duplicates the frontmatter triggers, and 关键纪律 includes meta-commentary ('猫的认知成本来自"工具间互相找"…'). Matches anchor 4 — efficient with a few instances that could be trimmed; not 5 due to that duplication, not 3 since padding is minimal.

4 / 5

Actionability

Fully executable, copy-paste-ready tool calls with concrete parameters: 'graph_resolve(anchor, depth=1)', 'search_evidence(query, mode="hybrid")', 'list_recent(scope="all", since="7d")', 'cat_cafe_get_message(messageId="裸消息ID", mode="full")', plus exact filter values ('["wikilink", "doc_link"]'), defaults/limits ('depth: 默认 1,上限 3') and a mode lookup table covering the common cases. As an instruction-only skill, absence of code is not penalized — the guidance is maximally concrete.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The decision tree gives a clear sequenced workflow (coordinate type → precise anchor? → keyword? → recent scan? → else hand off) with explicit feedback loops and checkpoints: 'low-hit 时会自动 nudge 你试其他入口(KD-7)', '看到 search_evidence payload 的 🧭 Memory navigation nudge…立刻试 graph 或 recent,不要继续盲搜', and '高分候选只表明相关,不等于本题所需的当前依据…改写查询或用 list_recent…再明确缺口'. Matches anchor 5 (clear sequence + explicit validation/error-recovery); not a destructive or batch skill, so no cap applies.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized sections (When to load / decision tree / noise control / tool family / discipline / privacy / chaining / related) with a clearly signaled one-level reference ('单一真相源:`../.cat-cafe-shared-refs/memory-routing-partial.md`'). Not 5: there is no in-bundle reference structure, the single-source-of-truth file lives outside the skill bundle, and the '相关' section retains a dangling '*(internal reference removed)*' placeholder — minor organization gaps per anchor 4.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A well-crafted description: it states the concrete capability (three-entry routing decision tree plus noise control and load timing), gives natural trigger phrases in a 'Use when:' clause, and disambiguates with 'Not for:' exclusions and an explicit output contract. Minor room to broaden trigger synonyms, but well above the typical bar.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and several concrete capabilities — '三入口路由(search_evidence / graph_resolve / list_recent)决策树 + 噪音控制 + 加载时机' and 'Output: 选定入口 + 噪音控制参数 + 进入对应 MCP 工具' — with a defined deliverable. Not 5 because the actions described are routing capabilities rather than a comprehensive list of concrete operations; not 3 because multiple specific actions and a named output are explicitly stated.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both: what ('三入口路由决策树 + 噪音控制 + 加载时机') and when ('Use when: 没先验、压缩后回顾、"我记得最近讨论过 X"、search_evidence 反复 low-hit'), and goes further with 'Not for:' exclusions and an explicit output statement. Clearly matches the anchor-5 example pattern of concrete what + concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural user phrasings are present — '没先验', '压缩后回顾', '"我记得最近讨论过 X"', 'search_evidence 反复 low-hit' — matching what a user would actually say. Not 5 because common synonyms/variants (e.g. '重建上下文', '找回之前的讨论', English equivalents) are missing from the description itself; not 3 because coverage of natural phrases is good, not partial.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche (choosing among three named memory-system MCP entries) with explicit carve-outs — 'Not for: 已有消息坐标或文件路径时直接读原文;代码符号查 Grep/LSP' — minimizing overlap with generic search/read skills. Not 4 because the not-for clauses plus named tool entries leave only minimal conflict risk.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

zts212653/clowder-ai

Path

cat-cafe-skills/memory-navigation/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.