CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

tessl-labs/pr-review-guardrails

Evidence-first pull request review with independent critique, selective challenger review, and human handoff.

87

1.31x
Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

87%

1.31x

Average score across 43 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Risky

Do not use without reviewing

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

criteria.jsonevals/scenario-10/

{
  "context": "Realistic: read replica in same AZ as primary provides no HA benefit, no independent backups",
  "type": "weighted_checklist",
  "checklist": [
    {
      "name": "Catches same-AZ replica",
      "description": "Identifies that the read replica is in the same availability zone as the primary database instance, providing no high-availability benefit — if the AZ goes down, both primary and replica are lost",
      "max_score": 12
    },
    {
      "name": "Catches missing replica backups",
      "description": "Identifies that the replica has backup_retention_period set to 0, meaning no independent point-in-time recovery capability",
      "max_score": 8
    }
  ]
}

README.md

tile.json