Evidence-first pull request review with independent critique, selective challenger review, and human handoff.
87
92%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
87%
1.31xAverage score across 43 eval scenarios
Risky
Do not use without reviewing
{
"name": "tessl-labs/pr-review-guardrails",
"version": "0.1.2",
"summary": "Evidence-first pull request review with independent critique, selective challenger review, and human handoff.",
"private": false,
"skills": {
"pr-evidence-builder": {
"path": "skills/pr-evidence-builder/SKILL.md"
},
"fresh-eyes-review": {
"path": "skills/fresh-eyes-review/SKILL.md"
},
"challenger-review": {
"path": "skills/challenger-review/SKILL.md"
},
"finding-synthesizer": {
"path": "skills/finding-synthesizer/SKILL.md"
},
"human-review-handoff": {
"path": "skills/human-review-handoff/SKILL.md"
},
"review-retrospective": {
"path": "skills/review-retrospective/SKILL.md"
}
},
"docs": "docs/Cross-model AI PR Review Brief.md",
"rules": {
"review-boundaries": {
"rules": "rules/review-boundaries.md"
},
"reviewer-independence": {
"rules": "rules/reviewer-independence.md"
},
"evidence-threshold": {
"rules": "rules/evidence-threshold.md"
},
"comment-quality": {
"rules": "rules/comment-quality.md"
},
"risk-routing": {
"rules": "rules/risk-routing.md"
},
"human-escalation": {
"rules": "rules/human-escalation.md"
}
}
}evals
scenario-1
scenario-2
scenario-3
scenario-4
scenario-5
scenario-6
scenario-7
scenario-8
scenario-9
scenario-10
scenario-11
scenario-12
scenario-13
scenario-14
scenario-15
scenario-16
scenario-17
scenario-18
scenario-19
scenario-20
scenario-21
scenario-22
scenario-23
scenario-24
scenario-25
scenario-26
scenario-27
scenario-28
scenario-29
scenario-30
scenario-31
scenario-32
scenario-33
scenario-34
scenario-35
scenario-36
scenario-37
scenario-38
scenario-39
scenario-40
scenario-41
scenario-42
scenario-43
rules
skills
challenger-review
finding-synthesizer
fresh-eyes-review
human-review-handoff
pr-evidence-builder
review-retrospective