Authors tests against Auth0 - uses tenant isolation strategy (per-PR tenant or shared dev tenant with namespaced data); exercises Universal Login + auth-code-with-PKCE + client-credentials + RO-password (legacy) flows; tests Action scripts (Auth0's serverless extension hooks); tests Rules / Hooks (deprecated but still common); integrates with Auth0 Deploy CLI (`a0deploy`) for environment parity. Use when the user works with Auth0 SaaS and needs unit / integration tests for tenant config, auth flows, or Action scripts. Does not cover session lifecycle (refresh-token rotation, silent re-auth): use session-management-test-author for that. Differentiates from oauth-flow-test-author by Auth0-tenant specifics: Action scripts, Rules / Hooks, a0deploy config-drift, and Universal Login.
75
94%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Tests against an Auth0 tenant fall into three layers:
a0deploy and commit the YAML as
fixtures for the config-drift check (Step 2).onExecutePostLogin
with a stub api and asserting on api.access.deny (Step 4);
apply the legacy callback signature for surviving Rules / Hooks
(Step 5).a0deploy config-drift diff into CI
(Step 8).Three patterns, per team scale:
| Pattern | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| Per-PR tenant (Auth0 sandbox plan) | Full isolation; safe destructive tests | Requires Auth0 plan supporting many tenants |
| Shared dev tenant + namespaced fixtures | Cheap | Test interference risk; cleanup discipline |
| Mocked OIDC server (e.g., mock-oauth2-server) | No Auth0 dep; fast | Doesn't catch Auth0-side behavior |
For tenant-level tests pick per-PR; for app-side flow tests, mocked OIDC is sufficient + faster.
The a0deploy CLI exports tenant config to YAML/JSON, supports
diff + apply across tenants. Pattern:
# Export dev tenant
a0deploy export -c config.json --output_folder tenant-fixtures/
# Diff against staging
a0deploy export -c config-staging.json --output_folder tenant-staging/
diff -r tenant-fixtures/ tenant-staging/
# Apply to staging from dev as source of truth
a0deploy import -c config-staging.json --input_file tenant-fixtures/tenant.yamlTests verify the export hasn't drifted unexpectedly:
a0deploy export -c config.json --output_folder tmp-current/
diff -r tenant-fixtures/ tmp-current/ # expect empty if no driftSource: auth0.com/docs/deploy-monitor/deploy-cli-tool.
Auth0's token endpoint:
https://{your-domain}.auth0.com/oauth/tokenFor client-credentials (M2M) flow:
import requests
def test_m2m_token(auth0_domain, client_id, client_secret, audience):
response = requests.post(
f"https://{auth0_domain}/oauth/token",
json={
"grant_type": "client_credentials",
"client_id": client_id,
"client_secret": client_secret,
"audience": audience,
},
)
assert response.status_code == 200
body = response.json()
assert "access_token" in body
assert body["token_type"] == "Bearer"For interactive flows (authz code), use Playwright to drive the Universal Login UI (Auth0-hosted login page) and capture the redirect.
Source: auth0.com/docs/api/authentication.
Actions are the current Auth0 serverless extension model (post-Hooks). Each Action exports a handler:
// post-login.js
exports.onExecutePostLogin = async (event, api) => {
if (event.user.email_verified === false) {
api.access.deny('Email not verified');
}
};Unit-test pattern with Auth0's testing library:
const { onExecutePostLogin } = require('./post-login');
describe('post-login Action', () => {
it('denies access for unverified email', async () => {
const api = {
access: { deny: jest.fn() },
};
const event = {
user: { email_verified: false },
};
await onExecutePostLogin(event, api);
expect(api.access.deny).toHaveBeenCalledWith('Email not verified');
});
});Source: auth0.com/docs/customize/actions.
Rules + Hooks are deprecated as of 2024 (per Auth0 deprecation notices) but many production tenants still use them. Unit-test pattern is similar to Actions but with the legacy callback signature:
function emailVerifiedRule(user, context, callback) {
if (!user.email_verified) {
return callback(new UnauthorizedError('Email not verified'));
}
callback(null, user, context);
}
// Test
emailVerifiedRule(
{ email_verified: false },
{},
(err, user, ctx) => {
expect(err.message).toBe('Email not verified');
}
);For Auth0 Hooks, similar pattern with the hook-specific event shape.
Auth0-managed sessions (refresh tokens, silent auth): refresh-token
rotation is configurable per-application; tests should verify the
rotation behaves as configured. For the full nine-point session
checklist (cookie attributes, fixation, idle / absolute timeout,
concurrent-session policy, server-side logout, CSRF, session
binding) against the app's own session cookie, see
references/session-checklist.md.
Cross-tool session patterns live in session-management-test-author.
For fast unit tests of the application's OIDC integration without Auth0 calls:
docker run -p 8080:8080 ghcr.io/navikt/mock-oauth2-server:0.5.10Then point the application at http://localhost:8080/default/.well-known/openid-configuration.
Tests run against the mock; per-PR Auth0 tenant unnecessary.
- run: npm install
- run: npm test # unit tests including Actions
- run: a0deploy export -c .auth0/config.json --output_folder /tmp/auth0-current
- run: diff -r .auth0/tenant-fixtures /tmp/auth0-current # config-drift checkA team ships a post-login Action that blocks sign-in for unverified
emails. On a shared dev tenant with namespaced fixtures (Step 1),
they export config with a0deploy export -c config.json --output_folder tenant-fixtures/ and commit it (Step 2). They
unit-test the handler by passing event.user.email_verified = false
and a stub api, then assert api.access.deny was called with
'Email not verified' (Step 4). CI runs npm test, then re-exports
and diff -rs against tenant-fixtures/; a stray dashboard change
to the Action fails the drift diff before it reaches staging
(Step 8).
| Anti-pattern | Why it fails | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Share a single Auth0 tenant for all envs | Config changes intermingle; staging breaks prod | Per-env tenants + a0deploy parity (Step 2) |
| Test Actions only via end-to-end | Slow; tests pass for wrong reasons | Unit-test Actions directly (Step 4) |
| Use password grant for new flows | Deprecated per RFC 9700 | Auth Code + PKCE (Step 3) |
| Skip config-drift CI check | Manual changes in dashboards never reach prod | Always diff exports (Step 8) |
keycloak-tests,
okta-tests - sister IdP toolsoauth-flow-test-author,
session-management-test-author - build-an-X authors