The body is mostly efficient and assumes competence (it leverages ISTQB, Bloom's, and STAR as classification tools rather than tutorializing them), but the Overview narrates research background and a four-point differentiation list in prose and repeats structured-interview research citations, so not every token earns its place — matching the score-2 anchor of 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened' rather than the fully lean score-3 anchor.

Provides copy-paste-ready guidance — a filled question-slot markdown template (Step 3), explicit role-to-slot-count and seniority-to-Bloom's-mix tables, a precise output schema (Step 5), and an anti-patterns table with fixes — matching the score-3 anchor for fully executable, specific, copy-paste-ready instruction rather than the incomplete/pseudocode score-2 anchor.

A clear five-step sequence (Capture inputs, Allocate slots, Author questions, Tune difficulty, Emit bank) carries explicit checkpoints — a UNRECOGNISED_ROLE halt, a difficulty-too-far flag in Step 4, and a required hand-off block — matching the score-3 anchor; this is not a destructive/batch operation, so the lighter validation present is sufficient and does not cap at 2.

No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ absent) and the body is organized into clear sections with one-level-deep, clearly signaled references (sibling skills and external URLs in a References section), so per the simple-skills scoring note well-organized sections warrant the score-3 anchor; there is no nested/deeply-referenced structure that would drop it to 2.

Lists multiple concrete actions and outputs — 'produces a QA-role-specific interview question bank', 'emits a structured question bank covering technical, behavioral (STAR-format), scenario-based, and system-design dimensions, classified by ISTQB-canonical competency areas and Bloom's taxonomy difficulty levels' — matching the score-3 anchor for listing multiple specific concrete actions.

Explicitly answers both 'what' ('emits a structured question bank...') and 'when' ('Use as the first artifact a hiring manager produces when opening a QA / test role, before scheduling the first interview') with an explicit Use-as clause, matching the score-3 anchor where both what AND when are clearly answered.

Natural hiring-manager vocabulary is present throughout — 'interview question bank', 'QA / test role', 'hiring manager', 'manual QA / SDET', 'competency model', 'ISTQB' — giving good coverage of terms users would actually say, matching the score-3 anchor; it is not merely partial coverage (score 2).

Carves a precise, bounded QA-hiring niche ('This produces the questions only - not the scoring rubric and not the gold-standard answer guide') with distinct triggers unlikely to conflict with sibling skills, matching the score-3 anchor; it is not merely 'somewhat specific' (score 2).