Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Well-structured instruction skill with an excellent, validation-rich debrief workflow and clean one-level-deep progressive disclosure. Weakest on conciseness (redundant research rationale) and body-level actionability for the delegated authoring stages.
Suggestions
Trim the in-line research rationale (anchoring-bias and inter-rater-reliability explanations) to a short citation; Claude already knows these concepts and the procedure stands without the justification.
Add a compact inline spec or micro-template for at least one authoring stage (e.g. the rubric's competency×question anchor table shape) so the body is actionable without always opening the reference.
Move the methodological 'Implements the canonical Levashina 2014...' framing into the References section to keep the overview focused on what to do.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely lean procedure and tables, but the interspersed research-rationale clauses (e.g. explaining anchoring bias and 'anchored rating scales are the load-bearing mechanism for acceptable inter-rater reliability') restate concepts Claude already knows and could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The debrief workflow is fully concrete (named halt codes, '>1 spread' thresholds, explicit no-hire/borderline floor rules), but stages 1-4 and 6 are actionable only by routing to references, so the body alone leaves minor gaps for artifact authoring. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 7-step debrief is a clearly sequenced process with explicit validation checkpoints (independent pre-submission required, INCOMPLETE_PANEL_SUBMISSION halt, spread flagging, bias flags, MISSING_RUBRIC halt) and feedback loops (re-score against anchor). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview with a stage table and 'The chain, end to end' section pointing one level deep to five real, well-signaled reference files (jd-author, interview-questions, rubric, calibration, onboarding), all confirmed present in ./references/; only the debrief it owns is inline. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |