Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, dense rubric body that gives concrete axis definitions with explicit PASS/FAIL bars, gates scoring behind a presence check, and defers the worked example to a clearly signaled reference. It assumes domain competence and adds only what is not already obvious.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and dense with substantive, non-redundant content — it deliberately defers test-case anatomy to a reference rather than re-deriving it, and uses compact tables (axes, conventions, anti-patterns) instead of prose padding. Every section earns its place; it assumes Claude's competence throughout. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable guidance — a Gate 0 presence table, per-axis PASS bar / FAIL trigger / basis tables, exact convention values ('Roughly 15 steps', tier percentages), and a fully worked before/after case — copy-paste ready rather than abstract direction. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences the review explicitly — Gate 0 validation first (a case that fails is reported UNSCORABLE with no axis verdicts), then per-case axes, then set-level axes, then verdict derivation — with an explicit gating checkpoint and a 'Judgment calls' section providing rulings for error-recovery edge cases. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is an overview that splits the long worked example into a clearly signaled one-level-deep reference ([references/worked-examples.md], verified present), keeping the body navigable and content appropriately separated. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |