Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-crafted retrieval/Q&A skill with clear grounding rules, a concrete example, and thoughtful edge-case handling. Its main strengths are the explicit workflow for looking up and quoting source material and the detailed guidance for handling ambiguous or uncovered topics. Minor weaknesses include slight verbosity in the edge-case section and the inability to verify referenced bundle files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is mostly efficient and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but some sections are slightly verbose — e.g., the edge-case guidance could be tightened, and some rules repeat similar ideas (rules 2 and 3 both address verbatim quoting vs. fabrication). Overall reasonable but not maximally lean. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides concrete, specific instructions: a clear lookup workflow (outline.md → transcript.md), explicit quoting rules, a worked example with expected output format, and detailed edge-case handling. Claude knows exactly what to do for each type of query. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The multi-step lookup process is clearly sequenced (check quotes.md first, then outline.md to locate section, then read transcript.md). Validation is addressed through rules about verifying verbatim accuracy and explicitly noting gaps. For a retrieval/Q&A skill, this is a well-defined workflow with appropriate checkpoints. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill references three external files (outline.md, transcript.md, quotes.md) with clear roles, which is good structure. However, no bundle files were provided, so we cannot verify these references exist. The SKILL.md itself is well-organized with clear sections, but the edge-case guidance section is somewhat long and could potentially be split out for a cleaner overview. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |