CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

ainativedev/aidevcon-2026-ldn

AI Native DevCon 2026 London — all conference sessions as interactive skills

71

Quality

89%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-crafted skill that efficiently teaches Claude how to answer questions about a specific talk. It excels at providing concrete grounding rules that prevent hallucination, clear output formatting templates, and a logical lookup workflow across supporting files. The graceful degradation when bundle files are missing is a thoughtful touch.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is lean and efficient. Every section serves a clear purpose — grounding rules, output format, and file references. There's no unnecessary explanation of what agents are, what Mozilla is, or how transcripts work. The brief context paragraph earns its place by framing the problem space concisely.

3 / 3

Actionability

The skill provides concrete, specific guidance: exact steps for how to look up information (read outline.md → locate section → read transcript.md), explicit formatting rules for quotes vs paraphrases with examples, and a clear fallback pattern when claims can't be verified. The output format examples are copy-paste ready templates.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The workflow is clearly sequenced: (1) check quotes.md first, (2) read outline.md to locate relevant section, (3) read transcript.md for details. Validation is built in via the grounding rules — never fabricate, verify against transcript, explicitly state when something can't be found. The fallback for missing bundle files is also clearly specified.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is well-structured as an overview that references three supporting files (outline.md, transcript.md, quotes.md) at one level deep, each with a clear purpose. The bundle files note gracefully handles the case where files are missing. For a skill of this size and scope, the organization is appropriate and navigation is clear.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is a well-crafted description for a highly specific knowledge retrieval skill. It clearly identifies the scope (a single talk), the actions it can perform, and when to trigger it. The description is appropriately detailed without being padded, and uses correct third-person voice throughout.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'answers questions about', 'summarizes key points from', 'retrieves verbatim quotes from'. Also specifies concrete topics covered including cq as a proposal for sharing knowledge across agents, reducing repeated agent mistakes from outdated training data, and Mozilla Manifesto principles.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (answers questions, summarizes key points, retrieves verbatim quotes about the cq talk) and 'when' (explicitly starts with 'Use when the user asks about Peter Wilson and Davide Eynard's talk'). The 'Use when...' clause is present and explicit.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes highly specific natural trigger terms users would say: 'Peter Wilson', 'Davide Eynard', 'cq', 'Stack Overflow for Agents', 'Mozilla.ai', 'Mozilla Manifesto', 'agent mistakes', 'outdated training data'. These are precise enough that a user asking about this specific talk would naturally use these terms.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Extremely distinctive — it targets a specific talk by specific speakers about a specific tool (cq) at a specific organization (Mozilla.ai). This is unlikely to conflict with any other skill unless there were multiple skills about the same talk.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

81%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation9 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

metadata_field

'metadata' should map string keys to string values

Warning

Total

9

/

11

Passed

Reviewed

Table of Contents